Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gary W. Edwards's avatar

Brilliantly presented, with thanks!

Joe Giessinger's avatar

The distinction between price, access, and participation is useful, but I kept thinking of Sara Danese’s recent retrospective on Cheval Blanc 2021. It sold well and was treated as an “obvious buy,” yet collectors are now sitting on substantial losses. That seems to challenge the idea that en primeur necessarily represents the lowest price a wine will ever command. Is participation ultimately the only rationale that survives when the investment case disappoints?

No posts

Ready for more?